Khomeini and Persian Literature Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Khomeini and Persian Literature - Essay ExampleAt the same measure he had in no way compromised with the Shahs regime. Because of this unimpeachable position Khomeini occupied and held the high moral ground. The Shah did non have a chance once his armament and secret police began to unravel.No one understood better than Khomeini himself the importance of mobilizing the masses through traditional religious symbolism. He used the tazyah processions which commemorate Karbala, the germinal historical occasion when Hussain was martyred, to mobilizing the people (p. 119). In 1978 he sent messages from abroad to Iranians asking them to prepare for the massive marches of the month of Muharram (p. 120). These would break the spirit of the military, who had no will to kills their own people. By converting the traditional mourning for Hussain during Ashurah into a challenge to the Shah, Khomeini again touched a deep chord in people (p. 121). Hussains calvary was in the cause of justice and h is fight against tyranny. Modern Iranians understood the message. The Muharram of 1978 was used to agitate for the abolition of the monarchy and the establishment of an Islamic state and to further challenge the the States (Baqer 1999, p. 245). In the next Muharram Khomeini directed people to return to their own neighborhood, in an attempt to calm things down.All this is not to suggest that Khomeini was manipulating people. ... 250). Indeed it took considerable line of merchandise to persuade him to speak only of Iran in order to mobilize the Iranian people. It required further discussion to convince him that the President of Iran must be an Iranian, not just a Muslim. It must be recalled that the first foreign dignitary he received after the revolution was Yasser Arafat (p. 252). Though an Arab, Arafat symbolized an Islamic cause, that of liberating the holy displace of Palestine. Islam for Khomeini meant Ithna Ashari or twelve Imam Shiism (Fereydoun 2003, p. 65). While providing the Shias with an immense reservoir of religious passion, this inevitably acted as a barrier between Shia and the Sunni areas and thereby created obstacles for Khomeini on the big Muslim world stage (p. 67). Yet Khomeini did move Shia and Sunni towards each other by declaring they were one. Throughout the Muslim world, he had earned the respect of the people. His challenging the USA, his constitution for integrity and public espousal of the Islamic cause were widely supported (p. 92). He had come to embody the moods of Islamic revivalism. As the USA became the focus of both(prenominal) cultural and political opposition, and because it was the age of the Western media, Khomeinis image, in turn, became the symbol of all that was wrong with Iran in the USA. Khomeini was depicted as a humourless, cruel and medieval monk (p. 110). Bearded clergy in flowing black robes, women covered in dark sheets, rituals centred around martyrs long dead, national hatred concentrated on the USA as t he Great Satan - where does Iranian society related to the USA How do we make sense of the close relationships between the two up to the 1970s and indeed almost obsessive mutual hatred from the 1980s The answers are as complex as any