Personal Space Essay Example for Free

Personal Space EssayI. IntroductionAn individuals ego- concept is the core of his some iality. Ones sensing affects separately aspect of military man manner the some dusts qualification to learn, the capacity to grow and miscellanea. For every act an individual makes, he or she manifests what character he or she has. One authencetic individual displays his own image finished the conveyance of his behavior towards an other. It is a mutual process whitherin the gor resolves and takes per take form to the approach of the sender. Our thinking and behavior during interaction be always in anticipation of a response. This certain behavior that we design in coiffure to attain interaction can be a convinced(p) or a negative one. At times, it can act as a defense and a way of concealing motives and thoughts.Human behavior is observed in the branch of Psychology to gain more than k at a timeledge that would contri simplye to an understanding of a certain culture based on the manipulation of the stimulus-response that would change human behavior despite of the underlying debate that behavior is hereditary or nurtured by the environment. It is to a fault a range of behaviors displayed by humans influenced by several factors such as culture, attitude, emotions, values and ethics. The behavior of a human being numerates on the potential and capacity of his or her strong-arm, genial, emotional, and mixer activity during the phases of human life (Hickson III, M. Stacks, D., 1985). Living with the contrary factors that would generate the expression of manners of an individual, it basically acts as the alkali of border thread the actual character of a certain person. In accordance to how great deal express their mental outlook, they respond and reciprocate towards the exposure of signals of the opposite arouse, the perception to invasion of own psychological individualized berth, and the characteristics and levels of liberty shargon by both parties.Personal blank space is known to be the bea fence ining a person which they consider as theirs (McConnell, J., 1985). It is their concealed spot wherein other people can non bottom and violate comfortably. beingness capable to value their ain space, they atomic number 18 able to set limits and certain zones on the ones they ar interacting to (Eyserick, H. Eyserick, M., 1983). Human beings by nature bounce back to the encroachment of their in-person space as Freudian would say. But once a persons ainisedized space has been penetrated by an outsider that understands the levels of comfort as of that of the recipient role of message, in that respect would be a certain allure of intimate bond among the two.Though intimacy has however to be delved into to have the preciseness of its boundaries and levels as to observe the certain characteristics wherein spectators are able to classify their rig when interacting with the person to whom they have invaded the priv ate space. At par with the receiver of this invasion of space, he or she would be able to discuss and critically analyze the response to the means of how their own space has been occupied without having to of a sudden jump into conclusion the actions being presented to them by the opposing party.Furthermore, through an interview, this paper will be the guide harmonisely by the words of experts of the daily examples of private and intimate situations that would help foreshadow into reading the oral and non-verbal signals to each one respondent would reciprocate in case to case basis. And to gauge whether or not this would be a case of colza or permitting ones self to break down walls for others to penetrate into their person-to-person space.The aim of this paper is to define, relate and categorize the development of a persons panorama on privacy and intimacy when interacting to the same and/or the opposite sex. It would like to explore into the dynamics by which personal spac e would be determined by an internal or extraneous influence upon it, and its connecter to intimate situations. This is to widen the perspective of teenagers within the researchers age group when dealing with their social groups and be aware of the tell tale signs of positive and negative intrusion of privacy and display of intimacy towards others. II. BodyPersonal space for me is the amount of space that you define for yourself by which you form of a roadblock (R. Tejeros, personal conference, February 13, 2012). This restraint of a persons personal space is where an individual secludes himself or herself from external factors that whitethorn hold to his or her reluctance to dish out the privacy that encloses a formed character (Gunsch, 2003). A character that has been influenced throughout its formation by numerous social groups that made this very individual self cautious to letting in strangers and known personalities alike to a realm that can make or break his or her dispo sition.Group dynamics is a study on personal and social space. These are standardized space perimeters wherein social clusters are able to reconcile the distinguishableiation of personal space and its violation also where social agents around us become an intimate, social, factor to every solar day interaction. Though space may be standardized by norms, the interviewee has presented a notion that personal space is still very relation on just about aspects. An individual defines it for him/herself and regardless of the standardization, and this is all based on the persons ability to consent to the external factors or decline its persistence to enter the boundary line of this persons space (R. Tejeros, personal communication, February 13, 2012).Furthermore, each person carries an invisible bubble around their bodies wherein the size depends on different factors such as personality, status and culture. This bubble is known to be considered as a persons own personal, psychological space (McConnell, J., 1985). It is an approximate area surrounding an individual which should not be trespassed by an unsuspecting spectator for it creates an unsteady social affinity that when pierced by others becomes a violation of personal space. This private space, which role is to keep violation down, comes with the diversity of cultures who establish and upright barriers when interacting with other people. Raising these heady barriers are sort of their salutaryty zones wherein people are unlikely to attack one another (Eyserick, H. Eyserick, M., 1983).With regards to the sex differences of personal space, the opposite sex would define personal space as a challenge. This would highly depend on the availability of the persons willingness to interact to the opposite sex. Most especially in cases where in the male would pursue a female to interact with, if personal space would be regarded as barrier as said above, this would complicate the premises by which the sender of the message would like to address their message. For to the highest degree cases, an aggression to entering the opposite sexs personal space would be seen as a threat.A scenario that deals with a same sex penetration of personal space however would be roam lightly as how Sir Tejeros (personal communication, February 13, 2012) said in his interview as there should be a level of friendship or kindred first before you can get comfortable with a person within the same sex. And if you are in that level, the personal space is not a problem. Based on this statement, the sexual orientation may be a high contributor to how other individuals would interact but regardless, a certain individual would still deal with others though with the factor that there should be a consequent blood that should be established and the ability for both parties to gauge the comfort that they share to each other. apart(predicate) from the relationship that have been formed prior to create a state of sharing ones personal space and privacy with each other, there are other factors that has been provided such as definition of the persons character, personality, cultural background, race/color, age, gender and current status/authority (Berba R. Tejeros, personal communication, February 13, 2012).These factors direct to both an easy relationship and appearance within the perimeters of the individuals personal space though these may also be grounds for stereotyping and biases that may cause for an individual to also reluctantly open up to others. It was also utter through the course of interview that with the cultural setup here in the Philippines, these factors would be somewhat different from the ones where racial discrimination is rampant in western countries as well as first world countries. There may be discrimination but in the cultural setup in the Philippines, the social conflicts are quite subtle and are more clear seen if verbally exposed. Either way, these factors are not to be of constant basis for personal space is a written reportive matter.Entering somebodys personal space is an indication of familiarity and sometimes, intimacy. The receiver of the message creates a line that would not or should not be crossed by the sender in an actual confrontation to be able to have a decent and comfortable conversation. When this boundary is transpired, it causes uneasiness between the two people interacting. It is by human reflex that people react to certain responses. Reacting defensively when personal space is invaded is one way of assessing its significance to that certain individual. This reaction of the person aggressed varies according to how his or her space is invaded and whoever violated it. Whenever a person feels threatened by an outside force to enter his or her personal space, he or she will have a tendency to dislike the invader as a reaction and dismiss all opportunities (Lindgren, H.C. Byrne, D., 1971).Eriksons theory of development states that inti macy would be attained through forming closely knit relationships which is basic to the growth of social interaction of early adulthood. (Davis, D. Clifton, A., 1995)Intimacy is known to be a token of familiarity and affection, a close relation or association with deep knowledge of a certain person, place or period of history. Most of the times, Intimacy is considered to be the act of being tippy of the people involved in a certain relationship and convey their thoughts and emotions by means of strong-arm contact. This way of expressing intimacy to the other party is most likely to be applicable for those people who are considered touchers and are more comfortable in using the non-verbal communication while interacting.Aside from expressing feelings and motives through physical contact, there are other factors that contribute to the building up of close relationship of the people involved. Being intimate can also be observed when people involved in a relationship are attached in a way that they spend most of their times with each other, shares roughhewn similarities and interests, can communicate easily and has a personal connection that other people wouldnt easily comprehend unless informed. Being intimate with another party depends on the built relationship of the people involved. It varies according to what and how intimacy is being expressed whether emotional, spiritual, intellectual or sexual (Berba, personal communication, February 16, 2012).There is a successful level of interpersonal intimacy, discrepancies from this stage and where it can possibly remunerate between the two people interacting. (Eyserick H., Eyserick M., 1983) As we all move through in getting to know someone deeper, we develop intimacy with them which is one of the factors that makes the relationship more profound. Building up a closer connection with that someone, certain levels of intimacy are exposed. For starters, people begin to see and judge if it is safe to connect with tha t individual in the stage of safe communication. In this phase, there are no feelings, personal vulnerability and opinions involved. This is the kind of interaction we have with people we dont know that well and shares minimal intimacy. In level two, which is where we start sharing other peoples thoughts, beliefs and opinions, we are beginning to reveal more of ourselves and already build have a small foundation.In this stage, disagreements of opinions shared reveal inflexibility and intolerance already and becomes the basis whether they are to await to the next stage or not. Continuing to the next phase, we start taking small risks and begin to share our own thoughts, opinions, and beliefs. If we begin to feel vulnerable, we can change our minds and switch opinions to avoid conflicts. In the next level, we now start revealing our feelings and personal experiences our own joys and pains, our achievements and failures and some of our likes and dislikes. This stage is more vulnerable than the earlier ones because in here, us being unable to change how we feel about something, we can now accept and receive judgments. The next phase of intimacy will be the highest level our needs, emotions and desires are being emphasized. This is the stage where we are known at the deepest core of our character and requires a great amount of trust in order to maintain the relationship built by the people involved. (Wilson, 2011)Entering a social relationship, verbal and non-verbal communication theory are expected. Verbal communication is the communication that uses words, either written or spoken. It also refers to the use of sounds and phraseology to relay a message. It serves as a vehicle for expressing desires, ideas, and concepts and is vital to the process of learning and teaching. This verbal communication varies according to the personality and mental outlook of a certain person. Non-verbal communication, on the other hand, is usually unsounded as the process of commu nication by means of sending and receiving messages which are not in the form of words.It is a natural, unconscious language that broadcasts the emotions and intentions of a certain individual by means of gestures, facial expressions and body language (Hickson III, M. Stacks, D., 1985). These non-verbal signals are separated into two kinds the touchers and non-touchers. People who are considered touchers are usually the individuals who are not good in expressing themselves in words and prefer to convey their messages through the use of physical contact. Non-touchers on the other hand are the ones who articulate their messages through non-verbal signals but do not require the use of physical contact they express their messages using body language such as facial expressions (Eyserick, H. Eyserick, M., 1983). through with(predicate) the interview conducted, Psychology professors, Ms. Berba and Sir Tejeros (personal communication, 2012), have exclaimed that in their field of study, th ey are more aware to theses identifiers that both actuate violation of personal space and cues on intimacy. They have provided examples that both can be plain from day to day cases and widely applicable to the target market of this paper. Examples of signals that trigger violation of personal space would be sitting very close to another person or the positioning of body parts that prevent the balance of the space that the individual and the other people share in a pubic place. A particular example that is observable within the male domination would be the violation of space wrong the comfort rooms.Based on the narration of Sir Tejeros, he stated that Theres this unspoken rule, which you capacity find interesting. In male comfort rooms, when there is someone occupying a certain urinal, you do not go directly to the ones beside it. So kunwari there are 3 urinals. There is someone doing his business here. And then theres 2 and 3, you do not go here beside him. You jump one urinal because thats the persons personal space. Seriously, that happens all the time. If you were a guy you would have noticed that. If someone would go near that, the other guy doing his business would look risky or hostile towards the other person. Kasi personal space niya yun, eh. Kasi like when you do your business in a comfort room, its something intimate and personal to you. So when someone goes way to near your area, K parang ganun.Another violation of personal space that Ms. Berba stated is the sudden outburst of emotion through verbal and non-verbal communication. That when a particular individual is very angry and frustrated, they are not aware and conscious of their actions because of the aggression and adrenaline that courses through their being thus having an brainish instinct to enter the personal space of their offender and violating their personal space. Though there may be positive violations of personal space as well, and the emotion that stirs up this violation would b e of surprise. And example would be when a bearer of good news delivers the message and the receiver becomes intimately grateful to the bearer and crosses the line of the senders personal space. This would still be a violation of personal space because the receiver was not able to respect the personal space of the bearer however this is another response that was through instinctively because of positive feedback to the message relayed.III. ConclusionThe interrelation between privacy and intimacy is the link of relationship that people have between each other. It is through a bond that they have, that they allow walls of privacy to be brought down and there is permission to be intimate with the other being. There are several factors that would contribute to this such as personality, cultural background, age, gender and status. Though these may contribute to a healthy interaction, these factors may also be causes for violation of personal space. The differentiation between people whos e social groups mingle with each other may produce friction if not properly addressed by the social norms that surround them. It is best that personal space of an individual is respected before advancing to a more relaxed state.However, personal space does not necessarily go hand in hand with intimacy and vice versa. It does contribute to one another as we have theorized beforehand, though we have been disproven that if personal space is not violated, this may be called intimate. Through research work and interviews conducted, we have distinguished personal space as a persons personal, psychological space. (McConnell, J., 1985) meanwhile intimacy is a token of familiarity and affection. Both are subject to change and have signals that would identify if an individuals personal space is violated or a person is being intimate with another.To further elaborate on the levels of intimacy that would distinguish the state of relationship wherein two individuals are involved, these levels co ntribute to how someone who is in the process of determining his or her position in the relationship and be able to pacify his or her intentions as to not cross the boundaries of the social norms. Apart from the levels, there are kinds of intimacy which are spiritual, emotional, intellectual, and sexual that would be the basis for a good foundation of a relationship.Signals that trigger intimacy and violation of personal space would be verbal and non-verbal communication. Verbal signals are on prose and non-prose means. On the other hand, non-verbal communication has touchers and non-touchers. They indicate stimuli-response contact and verify whether the process of communication is socially acceptable. These may not be necessary for all intimate partners though are highly observable throughout the society.Equipped with credible sources, this paper has given an array of responses that is useful for daily relations most especially for the target audience who are teenage adolescents wh o are undergoing inter and intra personal development. Expression of the mental and emotional outlook would be beneficial to build up the decision-making skills of a person. It also promotes awareness to the different kinds of scenarios that they would be dealing with in the future.